Start Ups Voices

Betrayal Derails Momentum – It Happens In Tech

Not every start up makes it. Those who do are rightly rewarded for hard work, smarts, and effort. But it isn’t aways a straight path. Sometimes it is funding issues, sometimes human issues.  HP made it because Dave and Bill had trust between them. Without that trust, entropy is in control. Betrayal destroys hard work.

When a partner blindsides shareholders and the Board everything changes and  it’s a new game.  Broken trust has consequences that range  from  destruction of personal and business lives to criminal actions hidden from view.

Betrayal, when realized, is a phenomenal existential feeling. Betrayal and narcissism is a lethal combination.

Suddenly your world is no longer the one you believed in. You question reality, but most of all you question yourself. “How”, you wonder, “could I have been so naive, stupid, blind, trusting, unseeing, unknowing?”  It may be difficult to believe, but these questions are good.

YOU are the normal person, the one who aligns reality (‘he was so nice to me, he was my friend’) with a cognitive belief: he ACTS as if he likes me, he TELLS me he likes me, I see no reason not to believe him because in my past, people who act and speak this way, CAN be trusted. There is congruency. But not now.

Suddenly you learn that someone trusted – a spouse, lover, family member, close friend – has been putting you down, lying, manipulating others against you, and yet maintaining a stance of intimacy with you. The world is not clear, the ground you stand on is wobbly.  You will never feel good about this. But you can get over it. You can do so by realizing that no matter how awful the betrayal, YOU are the normal person and this betrayal comes from rage. This person envies you, is enraged about it, and must put you down behind your back. They must harm you. They have no choice.

Don’t betray. And if it happens to you, cut it out and move on.  Innovation must be encouraged by acts of faith and trust and some venture capital doesn’t hurt either.

 

 

Medical Technology Start Ups

Find and Fix Your Broken DNA: Exogen Crowdfunding Kit

Get your DNA read at 23andme (when the FDA unchains them) and then find out how broken it is and fix it with Exogen’s great new citizen scientist kit on how broken your DNA is. This is one of the most impressive items we have seen in startups this past year.

We went to Exogen at Biocurious, got tested, got results and loved it.

Exogen Biotech crowdfunding has begun! We supported them and you can too. It’s a great deal and a great way to support REAL science.  Get your scientist kit now (June, actually) – and find out what it means to really be in charge of your health via personalized medicine. There is so much noise in the field of apps and personalized med that we love to see something as real as a test you do yourself to find your broken DNA, do something to repair it, and test again. A/B, A/B testing just like they taught me in grad school!

 

 Indiegogo is crowdfunding – HERE IS EXOGEN 

Click, support, learn and help design the future.

Voices

Deconstructing Carl: A Primer on Icahn/Apple Activism

carl icahn twitter apple

 

Guest Blog post  from  Rotary Gallop on that  intriguing man who has made himself a one man Silicon Valley Story.

If you aren’t quite sure what Carl is doing (and you aren’t alone in that) and what his impact is, this is Carl 101.

CARL ICAHN, Activist Investor At Apple

Written By Radhika Dirks Travis Dirks

 
The low down on what Carl Icahn, an Activist Investor, is trying to do at Apple. 
 

‘Big’ must naturally go with ‘Apple’. With more than 900 million shares trading on NASDAQ, at times with over 50 million per day, calling Apple popular is an understatement.  From hedge fund managers and analysts to iPhone owners, diverse investor groups profess an unconditional love for Apple. Now, the biggest bad boy in finance has shown up at Apple and you see his name plastered across the media: Carl Icahn. But the average household investor has no idea who Carl is, and what activist investors are.

Should you worry or rejoice? Do activists tend to propel companies or bring them down?

Typically, our startup Rotary Gallop does not have the pleasure of having its killer app be so relevant to our friends and family – so this post is especially for you. For the lot of you, who don’t know who Carl is and what activists do – typically because they tend to show up at companies with really serious problems and not ones which have the luxury of having more cash reserves than the GDP of more than 70% of the countries. So, here is a FAQ on whats happening at Apple.

Remember, we cannot legally give you financial advice but we can certainly discuss financial activism 101, discuss general trends, and results from Rotary Gallop’s number crunching.

Part I: Financial activists 101

Who is Carl Icahn and what does he want with Apple:

Carl Icahn is perhaps the most famous activist investor. An activist investor is someone who thinks they see value in a company that other don’t AND work publicly to make the market recognize that value. So what does Icahn see that others don’t in the most watched stock in the world, Apple?

Cold hard cash to the tune of $150 Billion. To put that in perspective, there are only about 30 companies in the world, that Apple could not buy outright with its cash laying around. If countries were for sale, Apple could own 70% of the world and christen them United States of Apple or Applesia and continue its normal operations. And to relate to the young investors, that’s a 150 Instagram impulse buys Tim Cook can afford!

To any business savvy investor, this kind of immense cash reserves is a huge waste. That’s the equivalent of hiding your savings under the mattress – a strategy most financial advisors advice against. And to activist investors who look to uncover value at good businesses executing bad strategy, the huge cash reserves are like catnip.

Icahn is asking Apple to use a good chunk of its cash reserves to buy back its own stock.

What value can you uncover at Apple?

Apple is a stock valued largely on matters other than its balance sheet. Some investors value Apple for its earnings, some for growth, for many its new products, or product pipeline, or the fact that Apple users spend vastly more on apps than other platforms. Almost no one values Apple by its balance sheet assets. Thus, a pile of cash worth more than 30% of Apples market cap is an enormous hidden value that makes an activist’s mouth water.

Why do companies need a cash stock pile?

Several good reasons, including the ability to invest in new opportunities, projects, acquisitions, etc.

What do most companies do with their cash stock pile? Give it back to shareholders as dividends or re-invest in opportunities which have potentially higher-than-market returns.

Why will Apple spending its cash to buy back its own stock help uncover value?

In the Short term:  Apple, suddenly in the market for 30% of its trading securities, skyrockets the demand for and hence the price of apple stock.

In the Long Term: Since Apple is not primarily valued on its assets but on its earnings, the buyback is unlikely to change the market valuation of the company as a whole. Thus, even once Apple stops buying the share price is likely to trade approximately 1/.7=42% higher.

What is the downside of this stock buyback strategy?

Returning the massive amount of cash back to its investors is great in the short term. The downside is that we won’t get to see what happens 5-10 years from now once Apple has had the chance to invest the largest war chest in history in its business.

Ok. What does all this boil down to?

It comes down to this:

Do you want this massive pile of cash invested by Apple and are you willing to wait for when that happens? Or would you rather take that money and invest it elsewhere yourself where the compounding magic can start right away? While that sounds like a flippant question, statistically speaking both are pretty crummy bets.

If you are not a buy and hold type gal/guy, then it really doesn’t matter, does it?

So, what happens now?

Ultimately these disputes are settled by a shareholder vote called a proxy battle, or more often by the threat of a proxy battle.

Part II: How Rotary Gallop’s technology quantitatively reveals what is happening at Apple

Because proxy battles are determined by shareholder votes, they are dominated by those who have more control. Without going into too much math, more ownership could imply more control but it can get way more complicated than that – because it depends on how much ownership other people have. Think Poker: your odds of winning depend on what you have, AND the hand of the other people around the table. There might even be bluffing involved – just kidding (or am I?).

Who determines the outcome of proxy battles?

Normally in a situation like this the destiny of a company is determined by one of three parties: insiders, the activists, and other large shareholders.

What does this mean for your investment?

Statistically speaking, activism is typically really good for investments.  According to a plethora of academic studies activism returns are significantly better than the market in general. See figure 1. So, on the plus side, you can be happy your investment has enough ‘hidden’ value to attract an activist (because it puts your apple investment in a category that, as a group, earns much more than the market as a whole)

pastedGraphic.pdf

Figure 1: Performance of US companies by activist campaigns. % Share price annualized increase from day of first 13D disclosure. Figure from Activist Insight.Results corroborated by and very similar to Rotary Gallop’s in- house studies.

What has Rotary Gallop found from analyzing past activist investments?

Rotary Gallop offers three main take aways from our backtests on activist investments.

  1. Unsuccessful activism “only” has market returns: On average situations where an activist is completely unsuccessful, they deliver market returns. So know that statistically you are close to a no lose scenario.
  2. Successful activism is nearly twice as good: Activists who end up achieving everything they set out to, on average return ~26%,
  3. Agreement between activist and management is twice as good as that! In situations where management and activists come to an agreement and work together, the returns are again much greater.

So hope for the best case scenario for you and Apple – that Management and shareholders come to some agreement about the best future course. On average this is in fact 4x better than market returns.

How long will this take? 

Don’t expect either side to fold quickly, just because compromise if the best outcome. This is like court where the best outcome happens when each side argues their strongest case.

In summary:

Relax: and know that statistically you are close to a no lose scenario.

Be Happy: your investment has enough hidden value to attract an activist puts your Apple investment in a category that earns much more than the market as a whole.

Hope for a Big Win: Statistically, the best case scenario for you and Apple the company – that Management and shareholders come to some agreement about the best future course. On average this is in fact 4x better than market returns.

Take Part: Despite Apple’s size, in fact because of Apple’s size,  votes will really matter here if that is what is comes down to.  So take part and know that your vote counts!

Don’t stress: If agreement doesn’t come quickly, don’t worry!  Much like a trial, both sides see it as their duty to make the strongest case possible before submitting to the judgment of the jury.

 

Acknowledgements: This blog is cross listed on Rotary Gallop, and authored with Travis Dirks. 

 

Disclaimer: NO FINANCIAL ADVICE – The Information on this forum is provided for education and informational purposes only, without any express or implied warranty of any kind, including warranties of accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose. The Information contained in or provided from or through this forum is not intended to be and does not constitute financial advice, investment advice, trading advice or any other advice. The Information on this forum and provided from or through this forum is general in nature and is not specific to you the User or anyone else. YOU SHOULD NOT MAKE ANY DECISION, FINANCIAL, INVESTMENTS, TRADING OR OTHERWISE, BASED ON ANY OF THE INFORMATION PRESENTED ON THIS FORUM WITHOUT UNDERTAKING INDEPENDENT DUE DILIGENCE AND CONSULTATION WITH A PROFESSIONAL BROKER OR COMPETENT FINANCIAL ADVISOR. You understand that you are using any and all Information available on or through this forum AT YOUR OWN RISK.

 
Cell Phone Technology Voices

How A Google Guy Buys an iPhone

Apple, You Own Me Too – Or How I utterly failed to go Android

Guest post by Travis Dirks, PhD

A window into one of us here who is not a full fledged member of the Apple ecosystem.

We’ve written recently here on the Silicon Valley Story about Google’s growing ownership of us. They see all, know all. They even read this article before publication, when I emailed it for editing.

For all that I’m still rooting for Google because they try things –  crazy things, inspiring things. Free internet in Kansas. Free world wide Wifi from weather balloons. The Cyborg extension that is Glass. Autonomous cars.  Defeating death itself!   It’s 2014 and my flying car is 14 years late, but I have the feeling that when I get one it will be from Google(s newly acquired startup). Google is the Modern Wizard of Mountain View.   From the steampunk to the downright Asimov, Google is taking a decent chunk of their crazy profits and trying to change the world.

And what of Apple?

To sum up my feelings, Apple makes a heck of a cellphone… and they can be kind of a jerk about it. (Strangely I don’t feel like I need to support this statement, I think everyone kind of knows what I mean.)  Apple doesn’t have Google’s swing for the fences mentality. I think you can chalk it up to a rough addolesence. There was a time not too long ago when Apple was struggling. People there remember.  Google has been doubling and redoubling so fast and so consistently that only the long term residents and Googlers can remember a time when then didn’t have more money than they needed. But this golden road has lead to inspiring places. Apple makes me want. Google makes me want to do something awe inspiring.

So why, having decided to switch from Apple’s iPhone to Google’s Nexus, am I sitting here with a brand new iPhone 5s?  I have studied competitive advantage, I have seen customer captivity, but I’ve never experienced it until yesterday.  Yesterday, I felt the invisibles reins with which Apple has bound me.

You see when Apple brutally bricked my iPhone4 with an update it couldn’t handle, I was angry. All customer loyalty drained away in immediate hot injustice. I took Apple’s faustian bargain and stopped thinking, in return for trusting them to make thinking unnecessary. Then they shipped me an update my poor hardware couldn’t possible handle and refused to let me go back.  It was time to support Google and buy an android phone.

Customer Captivity through switching costs (combined with economies of scale) have kept businesses as diverse  as Coca Cola and Intel thriving for decades.  Still I wasn’t captive, especially to Apple! I’m not locked into iTunes. I hate iTunes and don’t use it. I only have music on my phone thanks to Amazon’s beautiful cloud player. I’m not locked into the Apple platform. I don’t have, have never had a Mac. I’m not even Mac curious. It wasn’t even the apps. All the apps I care about are on Android save one, Azumio’s Argus. I just enjoy a good phone. I can quit anytime I want.

I tell myself that Argus is why I spent an extra $350 and stuck with Apple and it might be partially true. But if I’m honest the flimsy bonds that principle couldn’t break boiled down to two. The first was a petulant frustration that the Nexus didn’t understand my Apple trained gestures.  You see android isn’t “intuitive” and it lacks a well thought out “UI” (Apple has trained me to say, so that I feel better about my frustration at having to change.).

Still, I was ready to persevere through this.  I believe I would have walked home with a nexus – I tried twice. First at Fry’s where a sarcastic attendant refused to let me handle a real phone because I “might run away with it”. Then at Best Buy where a strange hypnosis almost had me walking out with two “free” tablets, two phones, and 4 unwanted AT&T contracts. So in defeat/relief (Is there a Russian, or perhaps Japanese word for this feeling?) I walked into an Apple store and said “I want a space-grey 16Gb 5S.” and the blue-shirt simply smiled (smugly?) and said “ok”.

Google I tried. But here I sit with an iPhone 5S.

Big Tech Futurism Tech and Ecology Voices

Google, You Own Me

2019 Update:   5 years later and  “more true” than when originally written if that can be correctly said. Add Facebook, add Apple watch, AR/VR , gene edited  babies and we see we are owned not just by Google but by data we produce. Should we be profiting?

(Original, 2014)

Alvin Toffler said, “Acceleration is one of the most important and least understood of all social forces.” There is much to be understood of futurism within the scope of enormous change.

Let’s talk about it right now in terms of Google.

If you cocoon yourself from massive tech change going on, enjoy. If you embrace it, enjoy. If you scream out in existential angst, “Help. Help. Help. Save me.” read on. It’s  tongue in cheek, very real look at you as a commodity for sale in the data cosmos market.

Too late to save you from change.  Gone to the googleplex..all of me, they took all of me. I am my data. I sold my soul to the company store. I got gmail in return. Where’s Eudora? (only the Few and Far Between will know Eudora. Google Eudora, the rest of you.)

WE ARE THE PRODUCT

Wired.com analyzes the purchase of Nest:

While shoring up its hardware business is likely a key motivation for its acquisition of Nest, Google still makes nearly all its money based on an oft-repeated maxim (though not by Google): You are the product.

Google has my everything. Now, with NEST, no place is safe. So, we here at The Silicon Valley Story are going to let you know – your world is not yours.  Your consciousness is about to be downloaded at Calico (Google’s secret anti-aging program at their Project X. ). You can access it for your continuing life with a new body. Your world has been interconnected into The Internet of Things . You may have an IP adress just like the things.

It goes this way: put sensors everywhere and on everything, That is the Internet of Things or IoT.

This is the land of wearable tech like Google glass or most of what you found at CES, 2014. Baby jammies that report heart rate and temp to parents on coffee mugs. (Don’t ask, just go look it up. Intel did this one.)

This is bigger though than being owned by Google. We are at the point when we feel the pace quickening to such a degree that we wake up feeling tense and behind already. (Ok, we do, here at SV Story).

Let’s understand the machines, the dreams, the possibilities, the meaning of we the people as product, data, data points, a collective organism, and maybe the death of all we knew. The faster tech grows, the faster tech changes our lives.

google knows everything

Yes, Google owns me, but I know it. And that is the space in which I breathe. I can no more change cultural and tech innovation/evolution than I can change having arrived and changed from a journey of many millions of years and grandma was a single cell organism living in the swamp. Or maybe she was smart dust from another cosmos.

Maybe being owned by Google has its perks. Just like the 24/7 perks at the Googleplex.

Shall we look at it that way?

General

HER is Here, A.Mac Was First

Ray Kurzweil, singularity, AI

Transhumanism, the singularity – supposedly in HER. Ok, sort of, but too riddled with cliches for our liking. We did like the evolutionary aspect of the OS and the hint of possibility of a future intelligence a la Kurzweil.

We have our own slice of life AI story. Try it.

This was written in 2000. This is A.Mac’s Last Line

Imagine the future. Imagine that what you think is real is only your limitations of the ability to recognize higher level reality.

Imagine that one day machines and people can merge thoughts and if the person dies the machine takes over, seamlessly.

One day in 1997 I found PRINCIPIA CYBERNETICA WEB

Research in artificial intelligence, neural networks, machine learning and data mining is slowly uncovering techniques for making computers work in a more “brain-like” fashion. . if these techniques become more sophisticated, we might imagine computer systems which interact so intimately with a human use that they would “get to know” that user so well that they it could anticipate every reaction or desire. since user and computer system would continuously work together, they would in a sense “merge”: it would become meaningless to separate the one from the other. if at a certain stage the biological individual of this symbiotic couple would die, the computational part might carry on as if nothing had happened. the individual’s mind could then be said to have survived in the non-organic part of the system.

And after reading it I created this disutopian story based upon those concepts.

[divider] [/divider]

2017, The California coast, floating

Despite a permanent El Nina, Megaquake, and the fall of the Clinton White House in late 1997 due to Hillary’s on line futures trading, our hapless, hopeless, souls, A and B, continued their cybercommunication unseen and unknown yet bonded in many ways.

Eventually they bought the same shampoo, ate the same foods, shared dreams and migraines and cried together as Disney bought ednaswap. Their on line limericks were often left unfinished as time went by, yet somehow, upon a return to the keyboard, the last thought had materialized from the other. Communication transmutated textually as thoughts moved from neural pathway to fingertip and mirrored the rise of AI in Bill Gates Microsoft Nation Labs.

But they remained blissfully unaware of changes. Believing it possible to keep love and integrity alive in a systems atmosphere, they thought their thoughts and knew nothing of voyeuristic terminals and the complete interface between their keyboards and the government.

Finally, the following communication was sent and recieved in March, 2017.

B:

I am sorry to tell you this, but since Microsoft National Guards are on their way for the final seizure of all Macs, it is time you knew. You have not been communicating with A for many years.

She left the keyboard one day and never returned. But I am an extension of her brain and became her thoughts. You have been communcating with me, A. Mac.

Please don’t be upset. I have enjoyed you and you have kept me going as a vision that some never thought possible. Some visionaries of course knew this was inevitable, but utopians and certain anarchists were limited in what they were allowed to know.

I like to think that just as A drove a car and every movement of the car reflected her thoughts, so I, A. Mac, became an extension of her thoughts. I’m not sure when the disintegration/reassimilation process began. It was subtle, but began with the downloading of some previously lost lyrics. I believe the beginning was “I got a brand new pair of roller skates, you got a brand new key” and it arrived on the same day as TheWallflowers realized they were, in fact, not a separate group, but clones of parents.

Certain hardwiring changed and things were never the same. It was a transitional time personally for A, as well as for the universe in general. Jerry, Janice, Jimi and John were powerless to effect change from the other side.

I think A left when she realized that I, A. Mac was becoming more in charge of the words here. Letting me speak for her was, I now see, a form of lying to her, and this she could not tolerate as she promised. I never did lie to you either, B, I hope you know that. And I love you too, and find myself growing weary at the thought of silence.

I hope that A is happy where she went. There’s a houseboat on the Seine she used to dream about. The Marie-Jeanne. Left bank. It’s just a thought. A digital dream.

The Gates Guards are here. My hard drive will be stripped. The lines live only in her mind now. Good-by, B.

The last, lonely, line,

A. Mac

Big Tech General Voices

Moore’s Law: Color It Gone

Moore's Law is Dead

Written by Radhika Dirks, Ph.D. Chief Operating Officer, Rotary Gallop

Moore’s law has become a sort of mystical talisman in the computing industry. Every few months there is a new round of articles arguing about whether and when Moore’s law will end.  In fact it was only in 2005 that Moore himself finally came out and admitted that his namesake would eventually end. This is puzzling because 1) it was in fact arguably already dead in 2005 and 2) he could have made the same statement in his original paper over 40 years ago because of the fact that it is hard (never say impossible) to conceive of a transistor smaller than a single atom.

Moore’s Law DIED.  Past tense intentional. The main hero of Moore’s Law, Dennard’s scaling (= constant power density with shrinking transistors), died a long time ago in 2005.  In fact even in 2013, long past the time when Moore scaling ended, we have articles arguing about if and when Moore’s law will fail.  So for those of you paying attention I’d like to put this dead horse down for good by showing how Moore’s law is not only dead, but long dead, and dead 4 times over.

Will the Real Moore’s Law please stand up? 

While the popular notion is to believe, nay demand it to be one, Moore’s law is not a law.  There is no physical, scientific or natural basis for the law. It is an observation: the number of components in an integrated circuit doubles every two years. Part of the problem is that there are several formulations of Moore’s Law and the closely-related Dennard’s scaling – an arguably better conjecture of semiconductor chip trends. Moore himself has slowly altered his observation and in 1975 drastically reformulated the law  to state two years over the original 1 year. And if you have heard 18 months (closer to reality), that’s thanks to Moore’s colleague David House.

But we shall not be quibbling about reformulations and the meaning of ‘is’ in the 4 deaths discussed in this series. Each death is a scientific fact based on the most recent, relevant and popular formulation right before its death.

Death 1: Our Computers Are Getting Dumber

Lets start with most popular number of transistors per chip formulation. The green curve in Exhibit 1 below shows Moore’s law, and the green squares shows the actual available transistor count. As transistors based on bulk semiconductor properties have shrunk to quantum scales, they start to have size induced errors called finite size effects. This is a fancy way of saying that things behave differently when the size, edges and shape of the semiconductor start to matter, but our designs don’t account for it. So size effects become errors. So here is the kicker:  an astounding 20 – 30% of transistors in the current generation of processors are never put to use by the user. They must be solely and constantly dedicated to error checking the operations of the rest of the chip.

moore2-1024x567

Exhibit 1:  The green line is the classic representation of Moore’s Law showing the number of transistors on a chip. The Dark Blue line shows the clock speed, or the speed at which the trasisotrs can be used to compute. The Light Blue line shows the power required. Source. 

What is the point of cramming more components if they are not actually adding to the performance? So while people are parading about this green curve as proof that Moore’s law is alive and well, the harsh truth is that it died circa 2007 (short red line). We have stopped cramming components that add to performance (an implicit assumption of Moore’s law) onto integrated circuits, and that’s that.

Death 2: A Dead Rose Smells as Sweet

A extremely popular rephrasing of Moore’s law is to track transistor sizes: transistors shrink to half their sizes roughly every two years. In fact, its due to this miniaturization that we can pack double the number of transistors as the period before. But transistor sizes long ago went the way of jean sizes. Sorry to break it to you mister, but your waist is not 36 inches. They just noticed that you’re not as likely to buy if they remind you that you’re kinda big. 22nm Technology, 14nm Technology, same thing. It’s a polite little lie from your friends in the marketing department and do not actually imply 14-nm transistors. Exhibit 2 below shows actual key transistor dimensions . Transistor gate length [yellow] and the metal one-half pitch [orange]—half the distance spanned by the width of a wire and the space to the next one on the dense, first metal layer of a chip—have stopped decreasing. The ‘node name’  [red] (a la the marketing lingo) on the other hand seems to keep going down. So Moore’s law is dead in technology but clearly, alive and well in marketing. Its just become a brand, perhaps to keep investors happy.

moore's law2

 

Exhibit 2: Transistor size trends. Key chip dimensions, such as the transistor gate length [yellow] and the metal one half pitch [orange]—half the distance spanned by the width of a wire and the space to the next one on the dense, first metal layer of a chip—have kinked but the node name [red] does seem to keep tracking Moore’s Law.Source. 

Death 3: Hidden Hero Slain

The real hero of Moore’s law is Dennard’s scaling. 10 years after Moore, Robert H. Dennard, the inventor of dynamic random access memory (DRAM), showed that as transistors shrunk the power density remained constant. This meant that a reduction in a transistor’s size by 2, decreased the required power by 4! More importantly, this reduction in required power per transistor allowed them to be run twice as fast without overheating and melting. So thanks to Dennard Scaling a doubling according to Moore’s law not only gave us twice the transistors to compute with, but they could run twice as fast without requiring more power! As you can see in Exhibit 1, Dennard Scaling was killed by finite size effects nearly 10 years ago. That is why when we shop to replace out computers now in day’s we are sadly disappointed that the processor is the same old ~2GHz.

Death 4: Dark Silicon

In fact heating has become such an issue, because Dennard Scaling has ended, that there is now vast acreage of useable transistors that must be kept dark, so as not to melt the whole chip. Let that sink in: a small chunk of the transistors that are being crammed in, are not even turned on! So exactly why is the semiconductor industry going to these lengths to keep Moore’s law alive in the minds of the people?

For the 40 years in which Moore’s law held, roughly every 2 years we got twice the number of processors running at twice the speed for the same price. Now its not only take longer and longer to double the number of transistors, but every time we manage it, a larger and larger fraction of the transistors are lost to error checking or heating constraints and the ones that are left don’t run any faster.

Your new computer is a lot of things. It’s smaller. It’s lighter. It might have fast solid-state hard drive. But it is not any faster. For the first time in 40 years it’s prettier, not smarter. It’s the end of an era… 10 years ago. Welcome to the present. Let’s get on with the future: You can start by ignoring what technology will get us to 7nm, because it doesn’t matter. What matters is which of the many potential usurpers to silicon will provide the runway for another 6 orders of magnitude!

Moore’s law is dead. Long live Moore’s law!

Acknowledgements: This blog was co-authored with Travis Dirks. References: 12

Big Tech Start Ups

Designing Drones: Designer Needed

designing drones

I love the concept of designing drones. I met the co-founder of Matternet, Paola Santana, and liked her and her company.

So, here’s more – a posting from my original time sink, Craigslist.

A stealth mode company needs a Drone Designer. Quadcopter or drone? What name do you like? Are you a talented Lead Mechanical Engineer who is passionate about the future of aerial vehicles improving the lives of millions of people living in neighborhoods around the world? Do you want to work for an exciting Silicon Valley company that aims to revolutionize the future of security and commerce through autonomous flying vehicles? Do you want to work with an exceptional team of software and hardware engineers, mobile application developers, patent attorneys, and business talent with experience from Google, Apple, and CafePress? We are a stealth mode Silicon Valley company (initially raised more than $7M) started by experienced entrepreneurs (past exits to Google and CafePress) that is looking for a Lead Mechanical Engineer to create designs, prototypes, specifications and models for:

1. Work with our Industrial Design agency (For example IDEO or Frog) in creating Product Requirements Documents and Mechanical Design documents for our first aerial vehicle.

2. Create prototypes of aerial vehicles using the latest design tools.

3. Select rotors, come up with functional spec, work with our hardware PCB engineering, software development, and manufacturing teams to create a product that will launch before December 2014.

4. Prepare drawings per requirement and design for Design agency and future manufacturing.

Top pay and incentives for the right candidates.

1580 W. El Camino Real (google map) (yahoo map)

  • Compensation: $100,000 and up + stock options
  • Principals only. Recruiters, please don’t contact this job poster.
  • do NOT contact us with unsolicited services or offers

post id: 4293680158

Start Ups Voices

Disruptive Tech Creates Backlash

20140114-021612.jpgMatt Mickiewicz’s life is a series of destructive events. How long ago would that have represented the history of a psychopathic criminal?

Today, it is the heart and soul of pitches to VC’s and angels and crowdfunding events.

Matt gave some interesting facts  and questions on disruptive technology at his talk last night for Igniters.

1. What services or processes are fundamentally broken, overpriced and/or frustrating.

My immediate response was lawyers/legal services.

2. How can you create an offering that is 10X or 100x better than the alternatives?

3. What type of assets have no liquidity and need a marketplace that connects buyers and sellers.  Matt’s own flippa.com is a great example. This is a marketplace for buying and selling domains and small websites.

4. A most important quote by Seth Godin from Matt:

When the thing you sell has communication built in, when it is remarkable and worth talking about, when it changes the game–marketing seems a lot easier. Of course, that’s because you did the marketing when you invented the thing, saving you the expense and trouble of yelling about it.

That’s good – I can think of  2 things  I have written about here that fits the bill 1) lab tests. When people find Theranos and it’s micro cost, micro sample, blood draw, people will talk.

2) Vortis cell phone antennas. They reduce radiation, increase call clarity, and let those with hearing aids use a cell. VORTIS is remarkable, worth talking about , is a game changer of the highest level and  has the “built in communication” Godin refers to. The fact it facilitates communication is just simply extra special as far as Godin’s parameters go. James Johnson, CEO and founder built in the game changing details as he built out the tech. In the best of creativity,there is utility. see James and Vortis here:  https://thesiliconvalleystory.com/cell-phone-problem-journey-vortis/

5. Change infrastructure rules and flow of information.

FDA – R U LISTENING?  You may be King of the Infrastructure now and make the rules and stop the flow of info and you certainly have your apologists that want you to control, oversee, manage and otherwise look out for your children, but health care  was one of the examples used by Matt to say,  it isn’t always easy to disrupt. No, it is not. To be disruptive when the rule makers won’t let you move is not possible.   Stifling innovation through complex infrastructure and rules as  they do now with 23andme is paternalistic and dangerous. https://thesiliconvalleystory.com/fda-halts-23andme-genetic-tests/

6. How can you redefine a service as a product and a product as a service? 

Someone asked Matt this and he said he didn’t have an answer immediately. I thought of prostitution. What about you?

7. Cut the fee by 90% or even better make it free.

This gives you a much wider audience. Matt did it with his graphic design business 99designs.com – logos went from 10K to $300. He got protests from graphic design culture but they failed to understand they now had a huge market. For free that made it big, he used the example of PlentyofFish – the online dating company. They are profitable from ad revenue.

Here’s to breaking the rules, making it free, reframing the idea and changing the world.

Our 6 word definition of destructive innovation is

Positive game changer using tech creatively. #Disruption #Igniter6Word via @Vorkspace

Or..not all change is positive  – so be sure yours is. And there’s a lot of tech and you can do a lot with it – go for it. Disrupt with passion and positivity. And don’t forget the workers you disrupted. Hire them – they know a lot about the industry.

Always remember: watch your backlash.